We use cookies to keep our website secure, personalize your experience and for web analytics purposes. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more. By clicking Accept, you agree to our use of cookies.
Are you a business owner grappling with decisions about the structure of your development team? In navigating the technological landscape, two recognized models—staff augmentation and feature-based teams—stand out as potential drivers for success.
This article will observe the key factors influencing the preference for these team structures, shedding light on the critical choices companies face, as well as list the pros and cons of staff augmentation and feature-based teams, and explore real-world examples.
The choice between staff augmentation and feature-based teams stem from factors such as project duration, scalability requirements, and the level of specialization needed for specific features.
Depending on the organizational structure, you may opt for a hybrid approach or choose the model that aligns best with your project goals.
Staff augmentation is a flexible workforce strategy where external professionals are seamlessly integrated into an existing team to address specific project needs.
These professionals work alongside the in-house team, providing additional skills or manpower for a defined period. Staff augmentation allows companies to scale their teams up or down based on project requirements without the long-term commitment associated with traditional hiring.
This approach proves particularly useful for short-term projects, specialized tasks, or when a company needs to access skills not available in-house.
Feature-based teams, on the other hand, are structured around specific features or modules of a project. Each team is entrusted with the end-to-end development of a particular feature, from conception to delivery.
This approach fosters a deep sense of ownership, accountability, and expertise within each team for the features they handle.
Feature-based teams often collaborate while working independently on their assigned features, cultivating a cohesive and specialized approach to development.
The below table summarizes the essence of each model mentioned above.
To summarize the insights provided in the table, it is essential to note that while staff augmentation teams offer flexibility and scalability, the downside lies in potential challenges related to team cohesion. External staff may lack a shared history or understanding of the company culture, impacting overall collaboration and the seamless integration of augmented professionals into existing teams.
On the other hand, feature-based teams bring a sense of ownership and accountability to specific features or modules of a project. However, the drawbacks include potential limitations in resource allocation flexibility. This poses a challenge in adapting swiftly to changing project requirements.
Tech companies may opt for staff augmentation teams for various reasons, as this approach empowers companies to navigate the dynamic tech landscape effectively and stay competitive in the industry.
Here are five key reasons why organizations choose such models in their structure.
Tech projects often experience varying workloads and requirements. Staff augmentation teams offer the flexibility to scale the workforce up or down based on project demands. This adaptability ensures that companies have the right resources at the right time without the need for long-term commitments.
Some projects demand specific expertise not available in-house. This approach allows companies to swiftly access professionals with specialized skills, ensuring that projects benefit from the latest technologies and best practices.
In the fast-paced tech industry, meeting tight deadlines is crucial. Staff augmentation and feature-based teams enable companies to swiftly onboard skilled professionals who can contribute immediately, facilitating the achievement of project timelines and ensuring timely delivery of products or features.
Hiring full-time employees involves long-term commitments and overhead costs. The augmentation model provides a cost-effective solution, allowing companies to bring in external talent for specific tasks without the burden of long-term employment costs.
The rapid evolution of technology often leads to skill gaps within an organization. Staff augmentation and feature-based teams enable companies to bridge these gaps by bringing in professionals with the latest skills and knowledge. This ensures that the team remains competitive and can effectively tackle new challenges.
Below we highlight six common ways in which augmented teams are integrated into the tech landscape.
Many companies opt for outsourced development teams to augment their in-house staff. This allows organizations to tap into global talent pools, often accessing specialized skills not readily available locally.
Some companies offer on-demand development services, allowing organizations to assemble a team of experts based on their project requirements. This model provides instant access to specialized skills.
Co-employment models involve partnering with professional employer organizations (PEOs) or co-employment service providers. These entities handle HR-related tasks, allowing companies to focus on project outcomes while benefiting from a flexible workforce.
Establishing an offshore development center is a common strategy for augmenting teams. Companies set up dedicated teams in different locations, often in countries with a strong IT infrastructure, to leverage cost advantages and diverse skill sets.
Companies may collaborate with other organizations, forming cross-functional teams to address specific challenges. This collaborative approach allows for the exchange of knowledge and expertise between different entities.
Platforms like Upwork or Freelancer connect companies with freelance developers and consultants. These professionals can be hired on a project-by-project basis, offering flexibility and specific expertise.
While this is the most affordable option, freelancers may work on multiple projects simultaneously, limiting their availability and commitment to a single project, impacting the consistency and availability of their services.
In this article, we’ve examined the key factors influencing the preference for staff augmentation and feature-based teams, listing the pros and cons of each choice and exploring potential integration scenarios.
Choosing between staff augmentation and feature-based teams requires careful consideration of project scope, timelines, and overall organizational goals. Striking the right balance or combining elements of both models could be the key to navigating the ever-evolving landscape of technology development.
As a premier custom software development and quality assurance company, Kanda brings over two decades of expertise, successfully delivering intricate software solutions across diverse technology platforms.
In the realm of team augmentation, Kanda serves as a seamless extension to your workforce. Whether navigating the challenges of digital health or any other industry, our commitment is to enhance your capabilities, reduce time to market, and mitigate risks, ensuring a smooth and effective integration of augmented teams tailored to your project requirements.
Eager to try our solutions? Talk to us today!
